dating a webley mk vi - Radiometric dating from a christian perspective

There are two possible reasons that the old dates were returned.

radiometric dating from a christian perspective-20

Of most people who have heard of this incident before, that's probably about the total depth of what they've heard.

And there's pretty good reason for this: Geology dating is pretty complicated, and if you look at Dr.

The bell curve of probable age starts at about 1.8 billion years, peaks at 2.4 billion, and dips back to the baseline at 3 billion.

So whether you call it an exact science or not is a matter of linguistics.

Austin's paper or at any scholarly criticism of it, your eyes will quickly glaze over from the extraordinary detail and intricacy.

So I thought this would be a great place to point Skeptoid's skeptical eye, and see how much of the chaff we can cut through to see what the bare facts of the case really are.

The 11% of the time that potassium decays into argon and not calcium is also a probability, so this contributes to the result having a known margin of error.

In addition, the initial amount of K that you started with is never measured directly; instead, it is assumed to always be .0117% of the total potassium present, which is the known distribution in nature.

Although the exact age can't be known, the probabilities be exactly calculated. Austin's sample was known to have solidified in 1986, its argon content was clearly well below the threshhold where an amount of argon sufficiently useful for dating could have been present.

And even that threshhold applies to only the most sensitive detection equipment.

We don't have all the answers, but we do have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the world.

Tags: , ,